part3 batak trades link

 
These products contin ued to be transported southward to the entrepots in
Malayu, but by the late eleventh century most of the supplies were going to
Barus and Kota Cina.
The founding of Kota Cina was not an isolated event but was part of the
historical oscillation in the Straits between a single dominant entrepot and a
number of smaller dispersed ports exporting the products of their immediate
interior. Based on recent archaeological explorations in Singapore, Miksic
believes that Kota Cina may have been simply one of a number of similartype
settlements along the Straits of Melaka, which came to include Singapore
(circa 1300) and Melaka (beginning of the fifteenth century) (Miksic 2000:111-
2). Contemporary with Kota Cina was a similar port at Pengkalan Bujang,
across the Straits in Kedah, to the north of the Merbok River. The area of
South Kedah was a site for two important centres based at Kampung Sungai
Mas from the ninth century and at Pengkalan Bujang from the end of the
eleventh century to approximately the beginning of the fourteenth century
0acq-Hergoualc’h 1992:300). Though Jacq-Hergoualc’h considers these two
sites to have been entrepot ports, Leong believes they were mainly a place for
loading and offloading ships, whose cargoes were then redistributed on the
Peninsula (Leong 1990:29). It is apparent that Kota Cina, too, served principally
as a depot for the supply of fresh water and Sumatran forest products.
Though Kota Cina may have been the dominant port on the northeast coast,
there were other possible outlets for Batak goods in this period.22
The economic opportunities offered by Barus and Kota Cina as alternative
sources of camphor and benzoin encouraged the Batak to move toward both
the east and west coasts in order to profit more directly from international
trade. A trans-insular route, though difficult because of the rough and broken
21 The main Minangkabau gold-producing areas are located in Tanah Datar. According to
Dobbin, the main route to the east coast from the valley of the Sinamar around Buo and the
Sumpur around Sumpur Kudus was by water or land to the headwaters of the Indragiri River
and then overland to the headwaters of a tributary of the Kampar Kiri (Dobbin 1983:60-1).
Satyawati (1977:9) suggests that Adityavarman moved his centre to the Minangkabau highlands
in order to control the gold and camphor trade via the Kampar and Batang Hari Rivers.
22 Soo (1998:296) mentions Kampar and Lamuri, but other possible ports were Pulau Kompei,
on Aru Bay, and Panai. Nevertheless, archaeological evidence seems to support the belief that
Kota Cina was the dominant port during its existence.
382 Leonard Y. Andaya
terrain, provided a safer alternative to the sea voyage from the west coast
around Aceh into the Straits. There was therefore an increase in the numbers
of Batak beginning to settle along the new trade routes.
Expansion of the Batak world
The Toba area is said to have been populated by people migrating from
the legendary first Batak village, Sianjur Mulamula, situated on the slopes
of the sacred Pusuk Buhit on the western shore of Lake Toba. Pusuk Buhit
is considered to be the birthplace of their common ancestor, Si Raja Batak,
and the home of the most powerful deities. From here groups left and settled
the series of valleys along the west coast of Lake Toba and then the
southern shores of the lake (Toba-Holbung) in search of rice-growing lands
similar to those found in their homeland. They later fanned out to the island
of Samosir, to the highlands west of the lake (Humbang), to the Silindung
valley, and then westward to the coast (see map 2) (Situmorang 1993:41-2).
In subsequent periods emigration from the Toba lands continued to occur
in response to economic conditions. The process is known among the Toba
Batak as marserak, which originally denoted migration within the territories
of one’s marga or into lands not yet occupied by other marga.23
According to marga origin tales, the point of dispersal was in the Toba
homeland (specifically the island of Samosir and the areas to the west and
south of Lake Toba) and the Pakpak region west of the lake (see map 3).24
Perret points out, however, that most European commentators place the origin
of the Batak peoples somewhere south of the Lake, where the German
mission was strongest (Perret 1995:56, 60). Their reports, Perret infers, may
have influenced later marga origin tales which acknowledge the Toba lands
as the point of origin of their group. As I hope to show, however, the circumstantial
evidence suggests that the Toba area may indeed have been a major
centre for later out-migrating Batak to both coasts and southward to the
present-day Minangkabau homeland.
As a result of the economic opportunities provided by Kota Cina and
other east-coast Sumatran ports between the eleventh and fourteenth centu-
23 The meaning of marserak has n ow expanded to refer to economic a n d social mobility. Other
words are currently in u s e to describe different types of migration (Purba and Purba 1997:22-5).
It must be emphasized here that reasons for emigration of individuals and groups vary considerably.
Economic opportunities, such as n ew trade possibilities, have always been a major pull
factor in migration.
24 This statement is based on genealogical stories contained in a number of sources, including
Sangti 1977; Hoetagaloeng 1926; De Boer 1922; Keuning 1953/54; Wilier 1846; Van Dijk 1895; and
J.H. Neumann 1926.
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 383
ries, Batak groups moved eastward from the Lake Toba and Pakpak regions
using a number of routes. Perret has drawn a useful map showing the spread
of various Karo marga from their homeland in the current Pakpak districts to
the present-day Karo region (see map 4). What is noteworthy is that the area
of the Karo homeland in the Pakpak districts is in close proximity to the camphor
and benzoin forests.25 The thriving trade in forest products encouraged
the establishment of settlements along the major routes which led from the
camphor and benzoin forests through passes in trie Bukit Barisan mountains
and finally down the rivers to Kota Cina. The shortest route from the Karo
highlands to Kota Cina was via the Cingkem pass and then either down the
Serdang River (known in Karo as Lau Tawang) or the Deli River (in Karo, Lau
Petani) to the coast (see map 5). But the easiest route from the highlands was
via the Buaya pass, which followed the upper course of the Ular River (in Karo,
Lau Buaya) to the area of Seribudolok on the border between the present-day
Karo and Simalungun lands. In the nineteenth century the most important
market for the Karo and Simalungun continued to be on this well-frequented
trade route (Westenberg 1905:603). A focus of many of these routes, as well
as the paths leading to the Alas and Gayo lands, was the village of Seberaya,
strategically located within a network of trails leading from the camphor- and
benzoin-producing forests, across the Karo plateau, down to Kota Cina and
the east coast (Edwards McKinnon 1996:69,1987:11, 22-4; Miksic 1979:254).
South of Lake Toba one of the earliest trans-insular routes led from Sibolga
on the west coast, through a low pass in the mountains, to Gunung Tua and
Portibi in the Padang Lawas region. Many of the sites from the eleventh to
the fourteenth centuries are located inland, their main function involving
trade with the highland groups (Bronson et al. 1973:77). Miksic points out
that ceremonial sites, such as those at Padang Lawas and Muara Takus (on
the upper Kampar River), were often located near the border between the
highlands and the coastal plains and ‘may reflect some function in regulating
intercourse between highland and lowland groups’ (Miksic 1979:97, 103).26
From Padang Lawas the major route southward passed through a number of
valleys and towns to Rao. From Rao it was possible to go directly to Muara
Takus via a tributary of the Kampar River, but the more used route seems to
have been to Buo and then out to the Batang Hari River. These routes encour-
25 See Perret 1995:37, map ‘Karo migrations according to tradition’. Sinaga also cites evidence
that the Karo trace their roots to the Pakpak area, which in turn acknowledges an origin in Toba
(Sinaga 1996:46-7).
26 In support of this claim, Edwards McKinnon suggests that the name of the village Portibi’
(Batak for ‘region or quarter) may derive from the Sanskrit pertiwi, referring to a centre of power.
In the Padang Lawas area there are two villages named Portibi: Portibi Jae (Downriver Portibi)
and Portibi Julu (Upriver Portibi), which may have been associated with groups representing the
uplands and the lowlands (Edwards McKinnon 1984,1:30-1).
Aceh
Pgmatangsiantar
Tanjungbalai
60 km
Map 3. Early Toba migrations according to traditions collected by Vergouwen
(from Perret 1995)
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 385
Binjei Medan
y Kutacane
Sembiring
Tarigan
Peranginangin
Ginting
Sinuraja
Barus
Sitepu
Lingga
Bangunpurba
‘/ j ^Gunungrintih
, ^ v , – • Barusjahe
Pematangsiantar
INDIAN
OCEAN 15 km
Map 4. Karo migrations according to tradition (from Perret 1995)
aged the migration of peoples from the area of Lake Toba southward into the
region that later came to be associated with the Angkola-Mandailing groups
(J.B. Neumann 1885, 2:17-8).
Migration from the Toba highlands to areas south of Lake Toba extended
into regions of the Malayu and the Minangkabau. It may have begun sometime
in the eighth century, with increased Srivijayan demand for camphor and
benzoin. According to some Malayu traditions from Kampar, the area of Rao
was once Batak but was later seized by certain Minangkabau chieftains. In
addition, the lands directly east of Rao were regarded as Batak. There is also
a story of an attack in the past on Muara Takus by Batak based in Kuamang,
which today is occupied by Malayu. In the nineteenth century a Dutchman
reported seeing in the neighbourhood of Kota Gelugur, on the Kampar River,
a stone inscribed in Batak characters. He explained that the inscribed stone
was intended as a commemorative tablet in honour of the first village heads,
assumed to be Batak in origin. Certain unique traits suggest that the people
of the area may have originated from Mandailing. J.B. Neumann believes that
until the middle of the thirteenth century the Batak occupied the northern
half of the Pasaman Mountains (known in Batak as Dolok Pasoman), which
386 Leonard Y. Andaya
MELAKA
STRAITS
INDIAN
OCEAN
Map 5. Areas to the north and east of Lake Toba
were the source of the Rokan, Siak, and the Kampar Rivers. These mountains,
he argues, marked the southernmost border of the Batak lands. In support of
this argument, he explains in a footnote that the word ‘Pasoman’ indicates ‘the
end of a world’ (J.B. Neumann 1885, 2:17-8). The fourteenth-century Lubuk
Layang inscription found on the border of South Tapanuli, near Padang
Lawas, dates from the time of the Minangkabau ruler Adityavarman and is
believed to have marked a frontier post set up to guard against attacks from
the presumably Batak kingdom of Panai (Satyawati 1977:6).
Ideas of a single Batak ethnicity were strengthened by the fact that many
of those who moved into new lands had a common origin. On the basis of
genealogies collected in Portibi and Mandailing in the early nineteenth century,
Wilier concluded that these areas were settled by migrants from the
Toba homeland. Only after they had been in the area for a long time did a
new noble lineage arrive claiming to be linked to the legendary rulers of
Minangkabau (Wilier 1846:262, 344-5, 400-2, 405). Other origin tales collected
by Batara Sangti indicate that the Lubis and the Nasution, two of the largest
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 387
marga in Angkola-Mandailing, stem from ancestors in the Lake Toba region
(Sangti 1977:129-30).27 The Lubis marga itself acknowledges that its founding
ancestor, Namora Pande Bosi, ‘the great iron-smith’, originally came from
Toba. Also claiming an origin in Toba is the Rangkuti, one of the oldest marga
in Mandailing. They believe that their ancestors were from the marga Parapat,
part of the Borbor group, whose datu are particularly feared for the potency
of their black magic. This may account for the Rangkuti’s fame as the home
of powerful datu (Ypes 1944:141-2). Smaller marga in Mandailing, such as the
Pulungan, Parinduri, Rangkuti, and Borotan, all acknowledge a Toba origin.
According to J. Keuning, two of the largest marga, the Mandailing Godang
and Mandailing Julu, trace their ancestors to Toba lands (Keuning 1953/54:
160-1; Vergouwen 1964:12).28
This movement of Batak people may have occurred at the time of the
most intensive use of the camphor-benzoin routes to Srivijaya/Malayu and
Kota Cina between the eighth and fourteenth centuries.29 Once these groups
became established in their new lands, others were encouraged to join them
in response to economic conditions that rose and fell in accordance with the
rhythm of international trade in the Straits of Melaka.30 The rise of pepper
as an export commodity proved to be a new factor contributing to Batak
emigration from the well-populated areas around Lake Toba. In about the
fifteenth century black pepper (Piper nigrum, Linn.) found a mass market in
China, where it was used in the preparation and preservation of food, and
by the seventeenth century China may have been importing between ten
27 In the current climate of strong ethnic identification and pride in ethnic difference, some
may take issue with these findings, since Batara Sangti himself is a Toba Batak.
28 Mhd. Arbain Lubis, a modern local historian, rejects any idea of a Toba origin for t he
Nasution marga, but argues that the ancestral figure, Si Beroar, was indigenous to Mandailing
(Lubis 1993:193-6). This view represents a common trend among various groups who stress
their difference with the Toba as a way of emphasizing their non-Batak identity. Batara Sangti,
a Toba Batak, cites genealogies to show that the Lubis and Nasution, two of the largest marga
in Angkola-Mandailing, originated from the Toba area (Sangti 1977:129-30). There will be those
who reject such claims because they represent views of a partial source.
29 After the Cola invasion of Srivijaya in 1025, the centre of activity shifted northward to
Jambi, to the old settlement known as Malayu. While the Srivijayan site on the Musi continued
to exist, it was the Malayu kingdom, with capitals both on the coast and in the interior, which
attracted the attention of foreign merchants. In the late thirteenth century, the Javanese kingdom
of Singosari under King Kertanagara attempted to assert its overlordship in the upper reaches
of the Batang Hari. The rivalry between the rulers of Java and Sumatra eventually led to the
movement of the interior Malayu kingdom even further inland to the mountains of the Bukit
Barisan. This then gave rise to the Malayu kingdom in the highlands of Minangkabau under
Adityavarman in the fourteenth century (L. Andaya 2001b).
30 A similar response to economic opportunities is recorded among the Iban groups of
Sarawak. Iban migration is a well-known phenomenon which continues to the present day. They,
like the Batak, moved into empty lands or into sparsely populated areas, quickly absorbing or
dominating the local inhabitants (Pringle 1970:249-51).
388 Leonard Y. Andaya
and twelve thousand picul (1 picul = 60.5 kg) of pepper annually. Europe also
became a major market for pepper, and by 1500 was importing about twelve
hundred tonnes yearly. To meet this burgeoning demand the Sumatran kingdoms
of Aceh, Palembang, and Jambi increased their pepper production.
Some of the Batak may have been enticed to move to the hinterland of these
kingdoms to participate in pepper planting.31 Aceh, at the northern tip of
the island, began to transform some of its interior areas into pepper lands,
and Sultan Iskandar Muda (1607-36) expanded pepper cultivation down
both coasts. He conquered other pepper-producing areas across the Straits,
in Kedah and Perak, to monopolize their production (B. Andaya 1993:43-6;
Lombard 1967:66).
The cultivation of pepper was labour-intensive and required almost continual
attention. Once the men had cleared the forests and planted the pepper,
the women and children were responsible for putting in support plants,
training the pepper vines around them, and weeding the root areas of the
pepper vine. The first pepper harvest came after the fourth year, with a large
and a minor harvest annually thereafter. The pepper-growers were therefore
kept busy picking, cleaning, drying, and bagging the fruit for much of the
year. It was estimated that it took a woman an entire day to sift a picul of pepper
berries. Because of the labour involved in growing pepper, most families
could not plant rice at the same time (B. Andaya 1993:70).
As the powerful rulers of Aceh, Palembang, and Jambi required more
and more of their subjects to plant pepper, rice production in these areas
declined. Rice had to be imported to feed the families now occupied fulltime
in the pepper fields. The surplus rice from the extensive wet-rice
(sawah) fields of the Minangkabau and the Batak in the interior of central
and north Sumatra became the favoured source of supply. Rice, which was
ordinarily scarce in Aceh, was available in great abundance under Sultan
Iskandar Muda (Lombard 1967:73). A major source of Aceh’s supply was the
east-coast polities of Tamiang, Deli, and Asahan, which he seized in order to
gain control of the rice grown in their hinterlands mainly by Batak. By the
mid-seventeenth century, Aceh was importing about 400 tonnes of rice from
Deli alone (Hirosue 1994:21). In the late seventeenth century a Chinese who
lived for ten years among the Batak in the hinterland of Deli described the
over-abundance of rice which the numerous inhabitants enjoyed annually (F.
31 Bugis slaves were used to plant pepper in Jambi and Palembang in the seventeenth century
because many local people refused to remain involved in the strenuous task of pepper cultivation
(B. Andaya 1993:96-7). Batak migrants willing to plant pepper would have been welcome in these
Sumatran kingdoms. Even in the early nineteenth century, when the peak of the pepper trade had
already passed, Anderson noted large numbers of Batak engaged in pepper production in the
interior of Deli. He observed that in the pepper season the river at the ford in Sunggal ‘is almost
impassable for the multitudes of people who flock there with produce’ 0- Anderson 1971:258).
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 389
de Haan 1877:647-8).
DIAN
OCE/AN
Map 2. Areas to the south of Lake Toba
The lands in the Lake Toba region were well known as a major source of
food, in particular rice and various types of root crops. When the missionaries
Burton and Ward visited the Silindung valley in 1824, they remarked that
rice and sweet potatoes were widely grown: ‘The former is produced both on
the hills and in the vallies in great abundance, and forms a principal article of
their barter with the bay. On the hills it is grown by the dry process, according
to the common practice with mountain rice; in the valleys irrigation is
employed with some ingenuity. The sweet potatoe grows luxuriantly in
every part of the country, but occupies chiefly the sides of the hills.’ (Burton
and Ward 1827:510.) In the Karo lands sawah fields irrigated by small streams
were laid out mainly in the dusun (the Karo plains from the foothills to the
east coast); whereas in the highlands they were located in the ravines. Dryrice
(ladang) cultivation was more typical in the highlands. The Simalungun
areas grew ladang east of the Karei River, and sawah in the ravines. The Purba
district and some pockets adjoining Lake Toba were planted in sawah, but
ladang cultivation was more common (Westenberg 1905:579-80). In the lands
south of Lake Toba, rice surpluses arose as a result of the extensive cultivation
of sawah in the fertile valleys of the lowlands of Mandailing Godang
(Groot Mandailing), and ladang in the highlands of Mandailing Julu (Klein
Mandailing) (Wilier 1846:370, 373). The sawah fields in the Padang Lawas
region, particularly those in Ulu Barumun, were also noted for their productivity
(Joustra 1910:286, 293, 302-3). Much of the extra labour required to
bring these new lands under cultivation would have come from the populous
areas in the Lake Toba region with their experienced food producers,
thus giving rise to another movement of people from the Lake area to lands
in Karo, Simalungun, and Angkola-Mandailing.
While the international demand for camphor, benzoin, and pepper provided
a major stimulus for Batak migration (marserak), other factors contributed
to the process. They were status enhancement through the founding of
new villages, desire for land, family disputes, the desire for safety from enemies,
and the need to find new land for a growing population (Vergouwen
1964).32 Other more cultural motives for continuing Toba Batak migrations
mentioned by modern scholars are the desire for a long life and numerous
descendants (hagabeon); prosperity and well-being (hamoraon); social status
(hasangapon); ability to exercise authority {sahala harajaon); and skill in gaining
respect (sahala hasangapon) (Purba and Purba 1997:21).
As a result of the extension of the Batak world into new areas, modifications
in the existing marga system occurred. Individuals became members
32 See also ‘Nota over de Landsgroten van Deli’ (unpublished manuscript owned by Tengku
Sinar Luckman, with no indication of original source), p. 15.
390 Leonard Y. Andaya
of new marga through migration, adoption, and birth from ‘incestuous’ relationships
(that is, marriage between members of the same marga) (Ypes 1932:
v). The lands now occupied by the Karo, the Simalungun, and the Angkola-
Mandailing offer more examples of newly formed marga than the Toba areas.
The Toba have extensive genealogies tracing groups to the primeval ancestor,
Si Raja Batak, whereas Simalungung genealogies, for example, rarely go
beyond three generations (Clauss 1982:44). When Van der Tuuk was translating
the Old Testament into Toba Batak in the mid-nineteenth century, he
found that what interested the Toba most were the long biblical genealogies
(Nieuwenhuys 1962:47). In the following century Keuning (1948:15-6) also
noted the great Toba interest in and knowledge of the links among the marga.
People would explain how the marga came to form a main marga, which were
the oldest, middle, and youngest, and how marga came to give rise to even
larger marga, culminating in the moieties of the Lonrung and the Sumba.
The tendency for the Batak, other than the Toba, to downplay genealogical
depth may reflect the relative newness of their marga and therefore the need
to emphasize other more useful linkages than that of an ancestral lineage.
The Karo today usually characterize their society by and base their
identity on the idea of the Merga Silima, or ‘the Five Marga’.33 They are the
marga Karo-Karo, Peranginangin, Ginting, Tarigan, and Sembiring, which all
claim an origin from lands to the west. J.H. Neumann (1926:2-3) suggested
that the ‘original’ inhabitants were a small marga, Karo Sekali, on the basis
of their name, which he translated as ‘genuine or true Karo’ (echte Karo), but
that idea has been challenged.34 Unlike the Toba, with their extended patrilineally
based genealogies going back to a common mythical ancestor, the
Karo emphasize the matrimonial bonds among the five major clans and the
alliances created in the formation of new marga under a local mother marga
(Kipp 1996:34; Singarimbun 1975:71-6; Sinaga 1996:283).35 Equally striking
is Singarimbun’s claim that the ‘Karo do not possess any myth of the origin
of their own society’, nor a ‘ritual center’. The Karo clans, he argues, are not
descent groups, ‘have no history of common origin’, and ‘do not regard themselves
as agnatically related to one another’ (Singarimbun 1975:70, 72).
Simalungun society is very much like that of the Karo in stressing the
equality of the four basic marga of the Saragih, Purba, Damanik and Sinaga,
and ignoring the importance of long genealogical links to the founder of
33 Merga is the Karo term, but I have used marga throughout this essay to avoid confusion.
34 Rita Kipp first raised doubts about Neumann’s interpretation, which identified this marga
as the first or original Karo, because it was found in only one ward in a village (Kipp 1996:44).
Neumann’s views, however, seem to have been adopted by Batak authors themselves; see, for
example, Sangti 1977:129-30.
35 See also Sinaga 1996:284-7 for a description of h ow immigrants from the Toba and Pakpak
areas became part of newly formed Karo marga.
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 391
the marga. The marga do not play a very important role in Simalungun, and
there is an absence of any tradition of common marga territory, property, or
ceremonies (Tarigan 1972:47; Joustra 1910:184). These features of Karo and
Simalungun society appear to be much more in keeping with the nature of
rapidly evolving frontier societies where long-standing traditions have less
relevance than developments in the more recent past. With less venerable
traditions to consider, such societies were more likely to experiment and to
adopt new forms and ideas. A continuing important source for such innovation
among the Batak, particularly in the newly settled communities, was the
Indian subcontinent.
Indian influence and Batak identity
The Tamils were a formative influence on Batak society. Although a ninthcentury
inscription on the Malay Peninsula mentions the presence at Takuapa
of members of the Manikkiramam, a Tamil merchant guild, it was only after
the successful Cola invasion of Srivijayan territories in 1024-5, perhaps at the
behest of Tamil traders, that there was a noticeable increase in Tamil economic
activity in the region (Nilakanta Sastri 1949:25-30; Miksic 1998:120-1). In the
1088 Lobu Tua inscription described above, mention is made of local armed
men, oarsmen, agents, and merchants serving the Tamil guild. Through daily
intercourse between the Tamils and the local inhabitants in this thriving settlement,
ideas would have been exchanged (Subbarayalu 1998:31-3). Another
direct consequence of the Cola invasion was the emergence of Kota Cina.
Edwards McKinnon, the foremost expert on this historical site, has stated
unequivocally: ‘I now see Kota Cina as a predominantly Tamil trading settlement
established by a community of merchants such as the Ainnurruvar
[also known as the Ayyavole] who left an inscription at Lobu Tua’ (Edwards
McKinnon 1987:87).
In response to the rise of Kota Cina, there was a movement of some of
the Tamil population from Barus towards the east coast. Edwards McKinnon
found that the Sembiring marga of the Karo established itself at strategic
points along the routes leading from the west to the east coasts, and that
two of the villages, Deli Tua and Hamparan Perak, were located within easy
reach of Kota Cina (Edwards McKinnon 1987:90-1). The Sembiring marga is
believed to have had direct ties with Tamil traders. The name ‘Sembiring’,
meaning ‘the black one’, is often cited as a major clue. The names of certain
sub-marga – Colia, Berahmana, Pandia, Meliala, Depari, Muham, Pelawi and
Tekan – are clearly of south Indian origin (Edwards McKinnon 1987:85-6;
Parkin 1978:82, 94 fn 47; Singarimbun 1975:78-80; J.H. Neumann 1926:16-7).
In further support of a southern Indian origin of the Sembiring marga, some
392 Leonard Y. Andaya
scholars have cited a mode of disposing of the dead believed to have been
borrowed from the Tamils. This practice involves secondary cremation and
setting the ashes adrift (the pekualuh ceremony) and is found only in the Dairi
lands in the west and among the Karo (N. Siahaan 1964:114-5; Parkin 1978:94,
fn 47; Singarimbun 1975:75). There may also have been some Tamil influence
on Karo ideas on village structure. Urung, the Karo term for a village federation,
is believed to refer to a form of organization found in medieval Tamil
society (Edwards McKinnon 1996:93).
Another source of Indian ideas, particularly in the realm of magic and
religion, were the Indianized Malayu communities. Their influence is especially
evident in the Padang Lawas complex, perhaps the second-largest
archaeological site in Indonesia, encompassing an area with a radius of fifteen
kilometres. Judging from inscriptions found here, Padang Lawas played
an important role in the region from the mid-eleventh to the end of the fifteenth
century. Between 1935 and 1938 Schnitger found some twenty temples
here, as well as a Heruka figure. From the inscriptions and an analysis of the
statuary, he concluded that the devotees were adherents of Vajrayana Tantric
Buddhism, Sivaism, and a syncretic Siva-Buddhism. In one of the temples
found at Parmutung, Schnitger identified what he believed to be an image
of a queen of Panai who founded the temple and who was consecrated as a
Bhairavi (Schnitger 1964:93-4; Parkin 1978:84).
Many authors believe that the presence of Tantrism in the Padang Lawas
complex was due to Indian influence from Malayu/Minangkabau36 via east
Java. In support of this argument, they cite the famous fourteenth-century
Adityavarman statue in the form of the god Bhairava, one of the important
deities in Kalacakra or Left-Handed Tantric Buddhism, found at Rambahan
on the Batang Hari. The inspiration for this statue can be traced directly to
the Singasari court of east Java, where Adityavarman spent some years and
left an inscription in 1343. The model was a similar statue dated 1292 of the
Bhairava seated on a dais surrounded by skulls and wearing a crown, earrings,
and a necklace of skulls (Parkin 1978:254-64; Heine-Geldern 1972:326;
De Casparis 1985:246; Fontein 1990:162-3). Tantric influence appears to have
continued under Adityavarman’s son, Anangavarman, who identified himself
as Heruka, a demon figure. At Kampung Lubuk Layang in Rao, in the
Pasaman district, a headless weatherworn statue broken in two was found
displaying Hindu, possibly Tantric, elements similar to the guardian statues
36 Although Adityavarman is generally regarded as the first Minangkabau ruler, he began his
career as ruler of Malayu. Once he established his base in the Minangkabau homeland, he called
himself Kanakamedinindra, or ‘Lord of the Gold Land’ – a reference to the island of Sumatra.
This shows that he sought to be remembered as the heir of the Srivijayan rulers who first
reigned in Palembang and later moved to Jambi, where the kingdom became known as Malayu.
Adityavarman never mentions the name ‘Minangkabau’ in his inscriptions (Satyawati 1977:9).
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 393
in Padang Lawas (Satyawati 1977:2, 6; Bronson et al. 1973:19).
There is also support for the argument that Indian influence may have
reached Padang Lawas from the north. Parkin, for example, argues that
many Sivaite ideas were brought by Indians themselves through communities
such as those found in Lobu Tua and Kota Cina.37 A team of archaeologists
visiting the site in 1973 concluded that it had no clear relationship with
Java (Bronson et al. 1973:19, 61, 64, 77; Satyawati 1977:2). Their preliminary
findings would suggest that the Padang Lawas complex was a result of
Indian influence coming from the port cities in northern Sumatra rather than
from Java and southern Sumatra. A third possibility is that Padang Lawas
received Indianized ideas from both directions and formed a cultural frontier
between the Minangkabau and the Batak.
Religion and the high priests in the service of trade
Whatever the ultimate source of Indian religious inspiration in Padang
Lawas, the evidence suggests that Indian magico-religious ideas were
eagerly sought by the Batak in order to strengthen their belief systems in
the ongoing struggle to improve their spiritual and material well-being. The
indigenous Batak religion, known as Perbegu or Pemena38, was not supplanted
by religious concepts from India, but came to co-exist with them.
It was therefore possible for the Batak to retain their own beliefs while also
adopting Mahayana Buddhist, Sivaite, and Tantric rituals.
Parkin explains that Perbegu can be viewed as ‘a cult of the human soul,
which in a living person is known as “tondi” and for a dead person is generally
called “begu”‘ (Parkin 1978:6).39 Tondi is sometimes translated as ‘soul stuff
and is found in smaller quantities in animals and plants. It is present in every
part of the human being, including the hair, fingernails, sweat, tears, urine,
excrement, shadow, and even in the name of a person. The most powerful
tondi resides in the placenta and the amniotic fluid at birth, and hence great
care is taken to dispose of these with the utmost secrecy. Ritual cannibalism
37 Three more recent works which include a detailed discussion of the impact of Indian ideas
on Batak indigenous religion are Parkin 1978, Pedersen 1967, and Rae 1994. In the present essay
I have simply focused on Tantrism as an important part of Indian religious ideas that appears
to have been particularly relevant in the southward expansion of Batak society towards the
Minangkabau lands.
38 The old religion is referred to by Christian Batak as Perbegu, or worship of ancestral spirits.
Because of the perceived derogatory nature of this name, adherents prefer the term Pemena,
meaning ‘the First [Religion]’.
39 The word varies from one Batak language to the other. For example, tondi is Toba, tendi
Karo, and tenduy Simalungun. In the following discussion the Toba terms are used.
394 Leonard Y. Andaya
provided the opportunity to strengthen one’s tondi at the expense of the victim
by consuming those parts of the body that are potent with tondi, such as the
blood, heart, palms of the hands, and soles of the feet.40 When a person dies,
the tondi becomes begu (ancestral spirit).41 The most powerful begu, and hence
the one subject to the most frequent appeals, is the sombaon, the spirit of an
ancestor who founded great communities and had at least seven generations
of descendants (Pedersen 1967:19-26; Rae 1994:18-20).42 Through public feasts
at which homage is paid, a begu is transformed into a sumangot, then a sombaon
(Sherman 1990:82).43 The ultimate test of potency was the possession of sahala,
which can be succinctly translated as ‘manifestation of supernatural power’.44
Sahala is manifested in successful economic and other ventures, numerous
progeny, influential relatives, skill in oratory, or bravery in battle. Respect
{hasangapon) accompanies one possessed of sahala, while to refuse to obey and
venerate such a person is to court disaster (Castles 1972:13-4).
From early times religion was closely linked to trade among the Batak.
Religious edifices were erected along trade routes to protect the trader from
adverse human and natural forces and thus assure the economic success of
his venture. Edwards McKinnon observed that from Padang Lawas southward
was a line of candi or temples marking a route from Tapanuli down to
the Minangkabau lands. More candi were found along rivers that were used
to gain access to the east coast. The Padang Lawas or Panai complex arose
due to its strategic location at the crossroads of several riverine and overland
routes.45 The ancient kingdom of Panai, sufficiently important to have warranted
an attack by Cola forces in 1025, benefited from its links to the interior
areas through the important trans-insular portage in the Panai-Barumun
river valley (Edwards McKinnon 1984,1:31-3, 330; Miksic 1979:97).
40 Early Western observers with little or no knowledge of Batak beliefs attributed the preference
for these particular parts of the human body simply to a matter of individual taste.
41 Joustra, however, subscribed to the view of others, who argue that the last breath of a person
becomes the begu. This is based on the belief that the breath cannot be destroyed, that what
is spoken is immortal because it is the wind (Joustra 1902:416).
42 Warneck (1906) describes sombaon as the highest stage that the spirit of the dead can
attain.
43 Sombaon is a general term for earth spirits or deities; Ypes believed that it referred also to
the dwelling-places of these beings (Ypes 1932:196).
44 Sahala is in essence the same as the idea of mana in Pacific Island societies. These communities
share a common Austronesian past, and the concept is one which can be traced to the
Austronesian language. For a discussion of mana, see Shore 1989:137-43.
45 Jacq-Hergoualc’h also noted the numerous temples in South Kedah, an area long associated
with Indian traders. These religious edifices were located at the ports and along the rivers
leading to the ports. He believes they were erected by a merchant or group of merchants seeking
the favour of the gods. He also noted the similarity in architectural styles between the temples
in South Kedah and those of Padang Lawas, which he attributes to the use of an Indian model
(Jacq-Hergoualc’h 1992:299, 304-5, 309).
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 395
At the Padang Lawas site, as well as in the Tamil settlements at Lobu Tua
and Kota Cina, temples were prominent. With the withdrawal of the Tamil
population and/or its absorption into the Batak community, perhaps after
the demise of Kota Cina in the fourteenth century, the candi were replaced by
tombs erected in honour of important Batak ancestors (sombaon). Westenberg
noted in 1891 that ‘Malay’ (most likely Batak, who moved easily between two
worlds; perhaps more properly called ‘Malayu Batak’) horse traders were
going to the Karo plateau from the east coast to make offerings at the tombs
of the Sibayak [lords] of Kabanjahe and Barusjahe. On the outward journey
betel was offered, but on the homebound journey, after successful transactions,
a goat or a white chicken was sacrificed (Westenberg 1892:227). These
ancestral tombs proved popular sites of spiritual power.
The religious institution that had the greatest economic impact on the
Batak was that of the high priests.46 Though it originated in the Toba lands, it
spread rapidly to the new areas where Toba migrants had settled. Situmorang
suggests that the Toba Batak believed in a sahala-harajaon, or ‘spiritual power
of governing’, which derived from the gods and was transmitted patrilineally
through the original founders of the three major Toba marga – the Borbor,
the Lontung, and the Sumba.47 It was this sahala-hamjaon which legitimized
the rule of high priests bearing the title Jongi Manaor among the Borbor,
Ompu Palti Raja among the Lontung, and Sisingamangaraja (preceded by
Sorimangaraja) among the Sumba (Situmorang 1987:221-4).48 Although they
were equal in stature within their respective marga, the Sisingamangaraja
was the best known to Europeans. The Ompu Palti Raja, unlike the
Sisingamangaraja, did not claim a divine origin, or authority beyond his own
jurisdiction among the Lontung. The Jongi Manaor’s pretensions were also
far more modest than those of the Sisingamangaraja; he claimed to have his
own areas, independent of either of the other two high priests (Situmorang
46 I have opted for the term ‘high priest’, rather than the more commonly used ‘priest-king’.
‘High priest1 appears more appropriate to the function of these figures in Batak society and
accords with Kozok’s belief that only the last Singamangaraja, the twelfth (1875-1907), referred
to himself as king. In his letters he claimed to be ‘Ruler of the Batak Clans’ and even ‘Ruler of
Sumatra’ (Kozok 2000b:274-6).
47 According to Keuning, Borbor initially formed part of Lontung. As a result of expansion
into areas both of the Lontung and the Sumba, the Borbor came to be regarded as a separate,
major marga (Keuning 1948:16).
48 In a more recent work, Situmorang asserts that Sorimangaraja was the title of the high
priests prior to the creation of the Sisingamangaraja institution in the sixteenth century (Situmorang
1993:218). This date, which is widely cited in the literature, has been arrived at by the
questionable method of counting backward assuming a certain number of years per sundut or
generation. Oral traditions (including those surrounding the origins of the Sisingamangaraja)
tend to telescope years and often refer to events which occurred far earlier. The Sorimangaraja
may have preceded the Sisingamangaraja, but when that occurred cannot be determined with
any certainty.
396 Leonard Y. Andaya
1993:77-8). The high priests’ success in promoting trade and agriculture was
an important measure of their sahala.
There is a fair amount of literature on the Sisingamangaraja, but little on
the Jongi Manaor or the Ompu Palti Raja. One can assume, however, that
many of the distinctive features attributed to the Sisingamangaraja would
have been ascribed to the other two categories of high priest. One of the most
extensive accounts of the origins of the first Sisingamangaraja comes from a
Batak text collected by CM. Pleyte. In this legend the deity Batara Guru causes
a jambu fruit to fall to the ground. It is found and eaten by the wife of the chief
of the village of Bakkara, and she becomes pregnant. After three years pass
with the baby still unborn, a spirit informs the mother that another four years
will elapse before the birth can occur. She will know when it is time because
there will be earthquakes, lightning and a heavy rainstorm, spirits will fill the
village square, and tigers and panthers will tear at one another. These things
occur, and the Sisingamangaraja is born with a black, hairy tongue. The afterbirth
is buried under the house, but lightning strikes at that very spot and
transports the afterbirth to heaven.49 Batara Guru’s messenger then brings
to the child manuscripts with astrological charts for augury purposes and
matters concerning planting and weaving, the calendar, the laws, and a handbook
of spells. The Sisingamangaraja confirms his supernatural origins by
openly declaring, ‘I am a descendant of the gods’ (Pleyte 1903:3, 6-7,15,17).50
Other legends were later added to reaffirm the Sisingamangaraja’s supernatural
attributes. In 1870 C. de Haan was told that the Sisingamangaraja could go
seven months without food and three months without sleep because the gods
supplied his every need (C. de Haan 1875:30).
The divine origins of the Sisingamangaraja made him an ideal intermediary
between the gods and the human community. He could make
peace, create laws, and expose both truth and lies – qualities that made
him unsurpassed in settling disputes. If a war continued unabated, he sent
a staff as a sign that a ceasefire should be declared and the parties submit
to his mediation (Tideman 1936:25-6; Meerwaldt 1899:530). He intervened
in disputes not only among the Batak, but also between the Batak and the
outside world (Cummings 1994:63-4). Early European observers believed
that these high priests exercised very little authority because there were no
visible signs of political power. Heine-Geldern, for example, acknowledged
that the Sisingamangaraja was effective in settling quarrels and mediating
49 As mentioned previously, the afterbirth is regarded as one of the most important sources
of a person’s tondi. The story of the removal of the afterbirth to the heavens emphasizes the
Sisingamangaraja’s divine origins.
50 There are variations on the story, but the general outline is the same. For a very detailed
account of the miraculous birth and life of the first Sisingamangaraja, see Tobing 1967:23-47.
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 397
peace between warring parties, but concluded, ‘otherwise his political power
was weak’ (Heine-Geldern 1953:376). What he failed to realize was that the
Sisingamangaraja and the other high priest figures exercised effective control
not so much through the use of force as through the threat of supernatural
sanctions implied in their words, letters, and widely recognized spiritual
powers (Drakard 1999; L. Andaya 2000).51
Although precolonial Batak society has been characterized by Castles as
being ‘stateless’, there was a hierarchy of institutions under these high priests
which provided a form of supra-village unity. The basic social unit was the
huta, or village, with a varying number of huta forming a horja, and a number
of horja constituting a bins.52 Religious leadership was provided by the parbaringin,
with the chief official of the bius (known variously as raja bius, raja
oloan, or raja na ualu) being chosen by the heads of the horja.53 At the apex of
this hierarchy stood the Sisingamangaraja, who instituted bius markets and
legitimized officials through letters of appointment. Among the responsibilities
of the bius was the hosting of the ‘large market’ {onan na godang or onan
bius), where the ‘great council’ (rapot bolon) mediated disputes and made
binding decisions on important public issues (Kubitscheck 1997:193; Sangti
1977:303; N. Siahaan 1964:112; Castles 1975:74; Tobing 1967:17-8; Situmorang
1993:40-4, 100-2).54
Situmorang traces the origins of the bius to the need for management of the
irrigation system, and hence the organization of agriculture and the implementation
of laws. The bius is usually described as a ‘sacrifice community’
because the culmination of its activities is the annual agricultural ritual and
sacrifice, at which the parbaringin officiated. In addition to ensuring the fertility
of the crops, this sacrifice provides an occasion for community integration
and renewal of commitment to its customs and traditions. Perhaps the most
important agricultural function of the bius was the promotion through the
51 Heine-Geldern points out, however, that the Sisingamangarajas had employed force in the
past. The first had led a war against the Lotung marga, another against the Padris, and a third
against the Dutch (Heine-Geldern 1953:374). However, these rulers were obeyed not so much for
their military as for their spiritual prowess.
52 Sangti says that some twenty huta would then form a horja, and seven horja would make u p
a bius (Sangti 1977:293-4). However, most other commentators give varying figures.
53 Situmorang further divides the bius into three categories, with the most developed being
the bius under the parbaringin. He characterizes the others as ‘developing’ and ‘backward’ bius
(Situmorang 1993:42-3).
54 So great was the reverence for the Sisingamangaraja institution that even after the last
Sisingamangaraja had disappeared in the nineteenth century, the Batak continued to respond
to rumours of his continued presence. In the 1920s a man emerged in Karoland who claimed
that the Sisingamangaraja had commanded everyone to slaughter a white chicken. The response
was immediate and widespread, causing an unprecedented rise in the price of white chickens.
In Angkola, people began to eat a certain type of fish because it was rumoured that the
Sisingamangaraja had ordered it to ward off evil (Castles 1975:74).
398 Leonard Y. Andaya
year of feasts and rituals devoted to the rice-growing cycle and the appeasement
of spirits (Korn 1953:36,126; Sherman 1990:80-5).55 The network of bins
organizations throughout the land provided a supra-village structure based
on a blend of economic, political and religious authority.
The Sisingamangaraja was revered for his powers in ensuring the material
welfare of the people through the promotion of agriculture, creating
harmony among the Batak groups through mediation, and maintenance
of the marketplace. In agriculture he was credited with the ability to bring
rains, locate wells, maintain the irrigation system, enforce the acceptance
of his allocation of rice lands, and ensure the efficacy of agricultural rituals
(Tideman 1936:25-6; Meerwaldt 1899:530; Situmorang 1993:42-3). The young
Sisingamangaraja was said to have been capable of causing rice plants to
grow with their stalks in the ground and their roots in the air. His control
over the growth of rice and various types of ubi or root crops and his ability
to cause rain and to locate well water were attributes expected of one
with direct links to the agricultural deities. Before the rice-planting season
began, the Sisingamangaraja conducted rituals invoking the ancestral spirits
to ensure a good harvest and hence prosperity for their descendants. In Toba
proper – though apparently not in Silindung56 – his appointed officials, the
parbaringin, presided over the sacrifices in the important agricultural rites.
Although there is very little information about the other two high priests,
the Ompu Palti Raja and the Jonggi Manaor, nineteenth- and twentieth-century
sources indicate that they continued to be highly revered for their ability
to summon rain and control rice growth (Hirosue 1994:20, 22; James 1902:
137; Van Dijk 1895:300-1). Conducting the agricultural ritual was considered
an essential task of the parbaringin to assure the ongoing prosperity of the
inhabitants, the animals, and the crops. As late as 1938 the Dutch received
delegations of parbaringin seeking the revocation of a colonial measure introduced
earlier in the century which forbade the performance of this ritual. It
was this prohibition, they asserted, which had resulted in problems in their
community (Korn 1953:32-3).
The esteem and respect for high priests among the Batak may have
increased even further when rice became an important Batak export commodity.
The rise of the pepper trade in the fifteenth century led to an
increasing demand for rice by communities engaged in pepper production
in Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula. It may have been around this time that
the Batak intensified rice planting in existing fields to meet this need. Rice is
55 Sherman, studying the ritual functions of the bius, concluded that it might be compared to
ancestral cults of the earth found elsewhere in Southeast Asia (Sherman 1990:82).
56 The Silindung constitute one of t he major marga in t he Toba area, which may account for their
ability to remain outside the Sisingamangaraja sphere of influence (Ginting forthcoming:291).
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 399
a fragile plant requiring intensive preparation and great care. Moreover, during
its growth it is vulnerable to unexpected weather changes, diseases, and
pests, which may destroy the entire crop. As a result, traditional rice-growing
societies everywhere have resorted to appeals to supernatural forces to
prevent the loss of a crop and to ensure a bountiful harvest. The Batak were
no different, and Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles commented on their belief that
the Sisingamangaraja could ‘blight the paddy, or restore the luxuriance of a
faded crop’ (Raffles 1991:436).
A second important function of the Sisingamangaraja was promoting harmony
among the Batak groups through his mediation. In this role he was able
to effect wide agreement on standard rice measures, as well as the assurance
that the sanctity of the marketplace would be observed. When the missionaries
Burton and Ward travelled to the Toba lands, they commented on the
influence of the Sisingamangaraja, who was considered by the inhabitants
to be ‘bertuati, or ‘invested with supernatural power’. His representatives,
whom Burton and Ward believed to be village chiefs from the surrounding
districts (Burton and Ward 1827:514), were known as parbaringin in the
Sumba districts. They were appointed by the Sisingamangaraja and had the
important responsibility of maintaining the viability of the markets (Castles
1972:18-9,1975:74).
By the nineteenth century it was possible to distinguish a heartland and
an extended network of communities forming a single Batak cultural unity,
promoted and strengthened by the activities of the high priests. Although
the latter had arisen among the Toba, their influence extended to the other
areas where the Batak had settled. The Ompu Palti Raja was the high priest
with the greatest influence among those in the Simalungun lands involved
in the trade between Lake Toba and the east coast, while the Jonggi Manaor’s
area of jurisdiction was in the lands between the interior and Barus. Of these
three, the Sisingamangaraja exercised the greatest influence among the Batak
communities in general. Representatives bore their insignia and exercised
authority on their behalf because of the awe and veneration with which the
Batak regarded these high priests (Hirosue 1994:22). As the Batak became
increasingly involved in international trade, these magico-religious figures
became the foci and the facilitators of the production and delivery of rice
and forest products from the interior to the coasts. The expansion of their
functions contributed to the evolution of a supra-village authority and to a
growing sense among the people of belonging to a single ethnic group under
the leadership of the high priests.
400 Leonard Y. Andaya
Ethnicization of the Batak
As the Batak moved toward both coasts and southward from Lake Toba in
response to economic opportunities, they came into direct competition with
the Malayu, the Minangkabau, and the Acehnese. In face of this development,
the institution of the high priests was invoked to promote ethnic unity.
The acknowledgement of the Sisingamangaraja as the overarching spiritual
authority over all Batak may have been a deliberate economic decision by the
Batak in order to compete effectively against the newly ethnicized Malayu,
Minangkabau and Acehnese.57 With the appointment of parbaringin, a hierarchy
was created whose major responsibility was the maintenance of agriculture
and the marketplace. If not the threat of supernatural sanctions then the
promise of economic advantage made the institution of the Sisingamangaraja
appealing to the Batak.
A European report from the early nineteenth century confirms the elevated
status and veneration enjoyed by the Si Singamangaraja among the Batak.
In a letter to Marsden dated 27 February 1820, Raffles wrote that among the
Batak he was ‘something like an ecclesiastical Emperor or Chief, who is universally
acknowledged, and referred to in all case of public calamity, etc. His
title is Si Singah Maha Rajah, and he resides at Bakara in the Toba district. He
is descended from the Menangkabau race, and is of an antiquity which none
disputes. My informants say certainly above thirty descents, or 900 years. He
does not live in any very great state, but is particular in his observances; he
neither eats hog nor drinks tuah [palm-wine]. They believe him possessed
of supernatural powers.’ (Raffles 1991:435-6.) In this letter Raffles claims
that the Sisingamangaraja was ‘universally’ acknowledged. Although it is
more likely that he had direct influence only over the Sumba group of marga
among the Toba Batak, stories of his supernatural powers would have been
sufficient to convince many other Batak to heed his words or those of the persons
delegated to represent him. In this way the Batak in the southern Lake
Toba region, who were the Sisingamangaraja’s principal adherents, would
have been joined by Batak elsewhere in forming a group responsive to his
wishes. While he did not possess any means for physical coercion, he had a
reputation for magico-spiritual powers which in earlier centuries proved far
57 I argue in other essays that there was a conscious decision by the Malayu rulers of Melaka
and Johor, the Minangkabau rulers of Pagaruyung, and the Acehnese rulers to appeal to a politicized
ethnic identity for economic reasons in the period between the sixteenth and eighteenth
centuries. Between the sixteenth and the late seventeenth century, Aceh saw itself as a Malayu
kingdom and was the dominant economic, political, and cultural entity in the Malayu world.
Only from the eighteenth century did a separate Acehnese identity emerge in recognition of the
success of Johor in becoming acknowledged as the centre of Malayu culture. See L. Andaya 2000,
2001a, and 2001b.
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 401
more intimidating. Instead of a political structure with the accoutrements
of state power, the Sisingamangaraja and other high priests created a unity
among many Batak groups on the basis of their sacred reputation, system of
marketplaces, and coterie of magico-religious officials operating in a borderless
world.
Batak ethnic consciousness was reinforced by the creation of pustaha, or
bark books. Written in a language and a script unlike anything possessed by
their neighbours, the pustaha were regarded as distinctly ‘Batak’. Although
employing an old Indian Pallava-derived script, there is no record of when
pustaha first began to be written. Kozok has shown that the Batak script continues
to display an affinity with the Pallava and Old Javanese (Kawi) scripts,
whereas modern Javanese has diverged quite significantly from the original
Pallava (Kozok 1999:65). Batak writing may have originated with the creation
of the pustaha, but remained relatively unchanged over the centuries, perhaps
because of the sacred contents. The pustaha contained astrological tables and
magic formulae and were intended for magico-religious purposes.58
The survival of a Batak language using a modified Pallava script to
transmit sacred and other tribal knowledge is noteworthy. From the seventh
until at least the fourteenth century, the dominant intellectual and political
languages in Sumatra were Sanskrit and Malayu. Their influence was particularly
strong, and evidence of their presence has been noted in the discussion
of the archaeological finds at Padang Lawas. Yet despite these cultural
incursions, the Batak were not overwhelmed by the expansion of the Malayu
language and culture into northern Sumatra (Teeuw 1959:148-51; Collins
1996:9). The survival and persistence of the pustaha tradition may have
been the result of a deliberate political choice at a time when the Batak were
becoming increasingly involved in economic rivalry with neighbouring communities.
As Pollock so succinctly explained, ‘Vernacular literary languages
do not “emerge” like buds or butterflies, they are made’ (Pollock 1998:7).59 A
Batak world was thus inscribed and circumscribed by the pustaha, which not
only played a magico-religious role but also became an important marker of
Batak identity.
Often in the introduction to pustaha, a chain of transmission of knowledge
from the legendary founder to the current writer is listed. Teachers
58 In a d d i t i on to t h e pustaha, there were other forms of writing, such as letters, pulas (a t y p e of
threatening letter), and laments, though the latter two forms tended also to have a strong magicoreligious
intent (Kozok 2000a:43-4).
59 I have based my arguments on Pollock’s stimulating discussion of the process of vernacularization
in India. Of particular value and relevance for the Batak situation is his argument that
there is a division of labour in languages, in which Sanskrit retains its position as ‘the public
literary expression of political will’, while the vernacular is restricted to ‘business’ or practical
aspects. He terms this language division ‘hyperglossia’ (Pollock 1998:11-2).
402 Leonard Y. Andaya
and pupils from different regions travelled together through the Batak areas
because their services were sought everywhere (Voorhoeve 1927:10, 13).
When the intrepid Italian traveller Elio Modigliani journeyed through the
Toba Batak area in 1890, he befriended the great datu, Guru Somalaing, from
whom he obtained a text by the ‘wandering datu’ of the Simanjuntak marga
intended for his pupils belonging to the Siagian marga. The itinerant character
of these datu is emphasized in another text collected by Modigliani, where
one of the great masters is called ‘Singa Mortandang’, or ‘wandering lion’
(Voorhoeve 1979/80:62, 78, 82). It was also commonplace for pupils to travel
long distances to study with famous datu (Kozok 1999:17).
Through long and intensive study, the datu acquired an incomparable
knowledge of the future, the characteristics of plants, and the wisdom contained
in the writings of the ancestors. The wandering datu was described as
not simply a religious practitioner, but also ‘a man of science who embodies
all current available historical, medical, theological and economic knowledge’
(J.H. Neumann 1910:2). Through his knowledge of the contents of the
pustaha, he became the primary source of the old tales, legends, and traditions
from which the Batak gained an understanding of their rituals 0.H.
Neumann 1910:2, 10).60 This latter function still survives among the Batak
today. Ginting describes a Karo guru, the Karo equivalent of a datu, who can
‘recite in a sing-song tone the old legends and myths which are important
in the performance of a ritual so that the participants understand its background
and can therefore experience the ritual more intensely’ (Ginting 1991:
86-7). The datu also used his knowledge of plants and the spirit world to
concoct the various medicines for treating and preventing illnesses, conduct
special rituals to ward off evil or recall a spirit which had wandered away
from a body, and prescribe potions to assist in affairs of the heart and give
self-confidence (Wilier 1846:295-6; Ginting 1991:86-7).
Because of the datu’s ability to assure the well-being of the community in
so many different ways, he gained the confidence and support of the people.
He thus became an influential advocate and an ideal conduit for information
and directives of the high priest. His wandering life-style and the practice of
accepting pupils from all over the Batak lands contributed to a network that
transcended territorial and marga divisions. Also strengthening the sense of
a unified Batak world was the pustaha tradition. Voorhoeve, in his intensive
study of pustaha, concluded that the sacred language of the texts derives
from a sub-Toba dialect spread by wandering datu, who were immune to
inter-marga and inter-village conflicts in precolonial times (Voorhoeve 1973:
60 Ginting reminds us, however, that not all guru [or datu] achieved the same level of competence.
Those with exceptional skill won a reputation as guru mbelin, or ‘great guru’ (Ginting 1991:
94, 96).
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 403
39). The spread of the pustaha tradition helped create a shared sacred language
and a common store of magico-religious lore. Prior to the twentieth
century, Perbegu/Pemena, or the old Batak religion, was a core element of
Batak identity. The key to the ethnicization of the Batak was provided by the
components of Perbegu/Pemena: the high priests, the datu, and the pustaha.
Conclusion
The people who are collectively known as Batak today were historically
never isolated from the developments occurring in the region. From very
early times they were incorporated into regional trade networks because
they were major suppliers of camphor and benzoin – two of the most highly
valued Southeast Asian commodities in the international trade from at least
the eighth up to the nineteenth century (Burkill 1966, 1:878-9). The involvement
of the Batak in international trade made them responsive to political
and economic shifts that had a direct impact on their livelihood. When
Srivijaya was conquered by the rival Cola dynasty in 1025, the Batak sought
other outlets for their products. The rise of Kota Cina on the east coast and
the re-emergence of Barus on the west coast as ports for the export of camphor
and benzoin drew the Batak towards both coasts. Though Kota Cina
itself disappeared sometime in the fourteenth century, other east-coast kingdoms
came to provide an outlet for the export of Batak forest products and
rice in later centuries.
While Srivijaya was still the dominant entrepot in the Straits, the Batak
used routes from the camphor and benzoin forests located to the northwest
and southeast of Lake Toba southward to Padang Lawas, then on to the
Batang Hari, and eventually to Srivijaya on the Musi River in Palembang.
After 1025 Kota Cina and Barus joined Srivijaya and Malayu as exporting
centres for these resins, and much of the camphor and benzoin supplies was
diverted eastward and westward towards the coasts. From the eighth to the
fourteenth centuries, Batak groups sought to profit from international trade
by following these routes and settling in proximity of these export centres.
Another major economic stimulus to Batak migrations was the growing
demand for rice among pepper growers in Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula,
beginning in the fifteenth century. To meet this new demand, there were
migrations from the Toba region to new lands south and east of Lake Toba
in search of rice lands.
Crucial to the success of Batak involvement in international trade were
their religious institutions. Candi and ancestral tombs were judiciously
placed along major trade routes to assure spiritual protection and success
for Batak traders. With the increasing tempo of trade and the dispersal of
404 Leonard Y. Andaya
Batak communities from the Lake Toba region, a need arose for some form of
supra-village control. This was provided by the institution of the high priest,
which originated in the Toba lands but gained support in the other Batak
areas. Through their claims of supernatural power, access to agricultural deities,
and creation of a network of officials and markets, the high priests were
instrumental in the promotion of Batak trade until their demise in the early
twentieth century. The activities of the datu helped to ensure continued support
for the high priests among the Batak in the pre-modern period.
As different ethnic groups became increasingly competitive in international
trade, particularly in the period between the fifteenth and eighteenth
centuries, every avenue was explored to gain an advantage over the others.
One response was the ethnicization of identity, or in other words, a conscious
decision to emphasize ethnicity to maximize their advantage. The Batak
became ‘ethnicized’ by stressing commonality in their acknowledged origins
in the Toba highlands, their recognition of the authority of the high priests,
and their reliance on the knowledge and spiritual powers of the datu and
their pustaha. In the early modern period being ‘Batak’ became both a political
and an economic option, resulting in the removal of huta and marga barriers
in the formation of a common Batak ethnicity.
REFERENCES
Andaya, Barbara Watson, 1993, To live as brothers; Southeast Sumatra in the seventeenth
and eighteenth centuries. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
-, 1995, ‘Upstreams and downstreams in early modern Sumatra’, The Historian 57:
537-52.
Andaya, Leonard Y, 2000, ‘Unravelling Minangkabau ethnicity’, Itinerario; European
Journal of Overseas History 24-2:20-43.
-, 2001a, ‘Aceh’s contribution to standards of Malayness’, Archipel 61:29-68.
-, 2001b, ‘The search for the origins of “Malayu”‘, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
32-3:315-30.
Anderson, Benedict, 1983, Imagined communities. London / New York: Verso.
Anderson, John, 1971, Mission to the east coast of Sumatra in 1823. Kuala Lumpur:
Oxford University Press. [Oxford University Reprints.]
Barth, Fredrik, 1969, Introduction’, in: Fredrik Barth (ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries;
The social organization of culture difference, pp. 9-38. Boston: Little, Brown.
Bellwood, Peter, 1997, Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian archipelago. Honolulu: University
of Hawaii Press. [First impression 1985.]
Boer, D.W.N. de, 1922, ‘Een en ander over de herkomst en uitzwerming der Bataks’,
Koloniaal Tijdschrift 11:86-95.
Bronson, Bennett, Besoeki, Machi Suhadi, and Jan Wisseman (eds), 1973, Laporan penelitian
arkeologi di Sumatera. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.
Burkill, I.H., 1966, A dictionary of economic products of the Malay Peninsula. Kuala
Lumpur: Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, 2 vols.
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnidzation of the ‘Batak’ 405
Burton and Ward, 1827, ‘Report of a journey into the Batak country, in the interior of
Sumatra, in the year 1824’, Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society 1:485-513.
Casparis, J.G. de, 1985, ‘Srivijaya and Malayu’, in: SPAFA Final Report, SEAMEO
Project in Archaeology and Fine Arts, Jakarta/Padang/Prapat/Medan, Indonesia,
September 16-30, pp. 245-53. N.p.: n.n.
Castles, Lance, 1972, The political life of a Sumatran residency; Tapanuli 1915-1940. [PhD
thesis, Yale University, New Haven.]
-, 1975, ‘Statelessness and stateforming tendencies among the Bataks before colonial
rule’, in: Anthony Reid and Lance Castles (eds), Pre-colonial state systems in
Southeast Asia, pp. 67-76. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic
Society.
Christie, Jan Wisseman, 1998, ‘The medieval Tamil-language inscriptions in Southeast
Asia and China’, journal of Southeast Asian Studies 29-2:239-68.
Clauss, Wolfgang, 1982, Economic and social change among the Simalungun Batak of North
Sumatra. Saarbrucken: Breitenbach.
Coedes, George, and Louis-Charles Damais, 1992, Sriwijaya; History, religion and
language of an early Malay polity. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Branch of the Royal
Asiatic Society 20.
Collins, James, 1996, Malay, world language of the ages; A sketch of its history. Kuala
Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Comaroff, Jean, and John Comaroff, 1992, Ethnography and the historical imagination.
Boulder: Westview Press.
Cornell, Stephen, and Douglas Hartmann, 1998, Ethnicity and race; Making identities in
a changing world. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Cortesao, Armando (ed.), 1990, The Suma Oriental of Tome Pires. New Delhi / Madras:
Asian Educational Services, 2 vols. [First impression 1944.]
Cummings, William, 1994, ‘Cultural interaction in a Sumatran state; Deli 1814-1872’.
[MA Thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.]
Dijk, P.A.L.E. van, 1895, ‘Eenige aanteekeningen omtrent de verschillende stammen
(margas) en de stamverdeeling bij de Battaks; Het priesterhoofd Si Singa
Mangaradja, syn ontstaan en syne afkomst’, Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-, Land- en
Volkenkunde 38:294-315.
Dobbin, Christine, 1983, Islamic revivalism in a changing peasant economy; Central
Sumatra, 1784-1847. London/Malmo: Curzon Press.
Donkin, R.A., 1999, Dragon’s brain perfume; An historical geography of camphor. Leiden:
Brill.
Drakard, Jane, 1999, A kingdom of words; Language and power in Sumatra. Kuala
Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Edwards McKinnon, E., 1984, Kota Cina; Its context and meaning in the trade of Southeast
Asia in the twelfth to fourteenth centuries, 2 vols. [PhD thesis, Cornell University.]
-, 1987, ‘New light on the Indianization of the Karo Batak’, in: Rainer Carle (ed.),
Culture and societies of North Sumatra, pp. 81-110. Berlin: Reimer.
-, 1996, ‘Mediaeval Tamil involvement in northern Sumatra, cll-cl4 (the gold and
resin trade)’, Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 69-1:85-99.
Eriksen, Thomas Hyland, 1993, Ethnicity and nationalism; Anthropological perspective.
London / East Haven, CT: Pluto Press.
Fontein, Jan, 1990, The sculpture of Indonesia. Washington: National Gallery of Art.
406 Leonard Y. Andaya
Ginting, Juara Rv 1991, ‘Pak Surdam; A Karo Batak guru’, in: Achim Sibeth (ed.), The
Batak, pp. 85-99. London: Thames and Hudson.
– forthcoming, ‘Inter-group relations in North Sumatra’, in: Geoffrey Benjamin and
Cynthia Chou (eds), Tribal communities; Historical, cultural and social perspectives, pp.
289-300.
Gonda, ]., 1973, Sanskrit in Indonesia. New Delhi: International Academy of Indian
Culture. [First impression 1952.]
Haan, C. de, 1875, ‘Verslag van eene reis in de Bataklanden’, Verhandelingen van het
Bataviaasch Genootschap 38:1-53.
Haan, F. de, 1877, ‘Een oud bericht aangaande de Batta’s’, Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-,
Land- en Volkenkunde 39:647-8.
Heine-Geldern, Robert, 1953, ‘Le pays de P’i-K’ien; Le roi au grand cou et le Singa
Mangaradja’, Bulletin de I’Ecole Frangaise d’Extreme-Orient 49-2:361-404.
-, 1972, ‘The archaeology and art of Sumatra’, in: Edwin M. Loeb (ed.), Sumatra; Its
history and people, pp. 305-32. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
Hirosue, Masashi, 1988, Prophets and followers in Batak millenarian responses to the
colonial order; Parmalim, Na Siak Bagi and Parhudamdam, 1890-1930. [PhD thesis,
Australian National University, Canberra.]
-, 1994, ‘Port polities and hinterlands in north Sumatra’, Paper presented at the 13th
Conference of the International Association of Historians of Asia, Tokyo, 5-9 September.
Hirth, Friedrich, and W.W. Rockhill, 1966, Chau Ju-kua; His work on the Chinese and Arab
trade in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, entitled chu-fan-chi. New York: Paragon.
[First impression 1911.]
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger (eds), 1983, The invention of tradition. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Hoetagaloeng, W.M., 1926, Poestaha taringot taromba ni Bangso Batak. Laguboti: Zendings-
Drukkerij.
Horowitz, Donald, 1985, Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Jacq-Hergoualc’h, Michel, 1992, La civilisation de ports-entrepots du sud Kedah (Malaysia)
V-XIV6 siecle. Paris: l’Harmattan.
James, K.A., 1902, ‘De geboorte van Singa Maharadja en het ontstaan van de Koeria
[District] Ilir in de onderafdeeling Baros’, Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-, Land- en
Volkenkunde 45:134-43.
Joustra, M., 1902, ‘Het leven en zeden en gewoonten der Bataks’, Mededeelingen vanwege
het Nederlandsch Zendelinggenootschap 46:385-426.
-, 1910, Batakspiegel. Leiden: Van Doesburgh. [Uitgaven van het Bataksch Instituut 3.]
Kahn, Joel S., 1993, Constituting the Minangkabau; Peasants, culture and modernity in
colonial Indonesia. Providence/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katz, Esther, 1998, Sexploitation du benjoin dans les hautes terres batak; Situation
actuelle’, in: Claude Guillot (ed.), Histoire de Barus, pp. 243-64. Paris: Association
Archipel. [Cahier d’Archipel 30.]
Keuning, ]., 1948, Verwantschapsrecht en volksordening en huwelijksrecht en erfrecht in het
koeriagebied van Tapanoeli. [PhD thesis, Leiden University.]
-, 1953/54, ‘Toba-Bataks en Mandailing-Bataks; Hun culturele samenhang en daadwerkelijk
antagonisme’, Indonesia 7:156-73.
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 407
Kipp, Rita Smith, 1996, Dissociated identities; Ethnicity, religion, and class in an Indonesian
society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [First impression 1993.]
Korn, V.E., 1953, ‘Bataksche offerande’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 109-
1:1, 32-51, 97-127.
Kozok, Uli, 1999, Warisan leluhur; Sastra lama dan aksara Batak. Jakarta: ficole Franchise
d’Extreme-Orient / Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
-, 2000a, ‘On writing the not-to-be-read; Literature and literacy in a pre-colonial
“tribal” society’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 156-1:33-55.
-, 2000b, ‘The seals of the last Singamangaraja’, Indonesia and the Malay World 28-82:
254-79.
Kubitscheck, Hans Dieter, 1997, ‘Horja and bius; “Pseudo-tribalism” in Toba Batak
society, North Sumatra’, in: Sri Kuhnt-Saptodewo, Volker Grabowsky, and Martin
Grossheim (eds), Nationalism and cultural revival in Southeast Asia; Perspectives from
the centre and the region, pp. 191-9. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Latham, Ronald (ed.), 1978, The travels of Marco Polo. Middlesex: Penguin.
Leach, E.R., 1954, Political systems of highland Burma. Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
Leong, Sau Heng, 1990, ‘Collecting centres, feeder points and entrepots in the Malay
Peninsula, c. 1000 B.C. – A.D. 1400’, in: J. Kathirithamby-Wells and John Villiers
(eds), The Southeast Asian port and polity; Rise and demise, pp. 17-38. Singapore: Singapore
University Press.
Lombard, Denys, 1967, Le sultanat d’Atjeh au temps d’Iskandar Muda, 1607-1636. Paris:
Ecole Frangaise d’Extreme-Orient.
Lubis, Mhd. Arbain, 1993, Sejarah marga-marga asli ditanah Mandailing. Medan: Departemen
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Marsden, William, 1966, The history of Sumatra. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University
Press. [Oxford in Asia Historical Reprints. First impression 1783.]
Meerwaldt, J.H., 1899, ‘Aanteekeningen betreffende de Bataklanden’, Tijdschrift voor
Indische Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 37:513-50.
Miksic, John, 1979, Archaeology, trade and society in Northeast Sumatra. [PhD thesis,
Cornell University.]
-, 1996, ‘Archaeology, ceramics, and coins’, Journal of the Economic and Social History
of the Orient 39-3:287-97.
-, 1998, ‘The Cola attacks’, The Encyclopedia of Malaysia, Early history 4, pp. 120-1. Singapore:
Didier Millet.
-, 2000, ‘Heterogenetic cities in premodern Southeast Asia’, World Archaeology 32-1:
106-20.
Milner, A.C., 1982, Kerajaan; Malay political culture on the eve of colonial rule. Tucson:
University of Arizona Press.
Milner, A.C., E. Edwards McKinnon, and Tengku Luckman Sinar, 1978, ‘A note on Aru
and Kota Cina’, Indonesia 26:1-42.
Neumann, J.B., 1885/86, ‘Het Pane- en Bila-stroomgebied op het eiland Sumatra
(studien over Batahs en Batahsche landen)’, Tijdschrift van het Nederlandsch Aardrijkskundig
Genootschap 2-2:1-134, 3-1:1-99.
Neumann, J.H., 1910, ‘De Bataksche goeroe’, Mededeelingen vanwege het Nederlandsch
Zendelinggenootschap 54:1-18.
-, 1926, ‘Bijdrage tot de geschiedenis der Karo-Batakstammen’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-,
Land- en Volkenkunde 82:1-36.
408 Leonard Y. Andaya
Nieuwenhuys, R. (ed.), 1962, Herman Neubronner van der Tuuk; De pen in gal gedoopt;
Een keuze uit brieven en documenten. Amsterdam: Van Oorschot.
Nik Hassan Shuhaimi b. Nik Abd. Rahman, 1984, Art, archaeology and the early kingdoms
in the Malay Peninsula and Sumatra, c. 400-1400 A.D. [PhD thesis, University
of London.]
Nilakanta Sastri, K.A., 1949, ‘Takuapa and its Tamil inscription’, Journal of the Malayan
Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 22:25-30.
O’Connor, Richard A., 1995, ‘Agricultural change and ethnic succession in Southeast
Asian states; A case for regional anthropology’, Journal of Asian Studies 54-4:968-96.
Parkin, Harry, 1978, Batak fruit of Hindu thought. Madras: Christian Literature Society.
Pedersen, Paul B., 1967, Religion as the basis of social change among the Bataks of North
Sumatra. [PhD thesis, Claremont College.]
Perret, Daniel, 1995, La formation d’un paysage ethnique; Batak et Malais de Sumatra Nord-
Est. Paris: Ecole Francaise d’Extreme-Orient.
Pleyte, CM., 1903, ‘Singa Mangaradja, de heilige koning der Bataks’, Bijdragen tot de
Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 55:1-45.
Pollock, Sheldon, 1998, ‘The cosmopolitan vernacular’, Journal of Asian Studies 57-1:
6-37.
Pringle, Robert, 1970, Rajahs and rebels; The Ibans of Sarawak under Brooke rule, 1841-
1941. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ptak, Roderich, 1998, ‘Possible Chinese references to the Barus area (Tang to Ming)’,
in: Claude Guillot (ed.), Histoire de Barus, pp. 119-43. Paris: Association Archipel.
[Cahier d’Archipel 30.]
Purba, O.H.S., and Elvis R Purba, 1997, Migrasi spontan Batak Toba (marserak); Sebab,
motip dan akibat perpindahan penduduk dari dataran tinggi Toba. Medan: MONORA.
Rae, Simon, 1994, Breath becomes the wind; Old and new in Karo religion. Dunedin: University
of Otago Press.
Raffles, Lady Sophia, 1991, Memoir of the life and public services of Sir Thomas Stamford
Raffles. Singapore: Oxford University Press. [First impression 1830.]
Sangti, Batara, 1977, Sejarah Batak. Balige: Karl Sianipar.
Satyawati Suleiman, 1977, ‘The archaeology and history of west Sumatra’, Bulletin of
the Research Centre of Archaeology of Indonesia 12:1-25.
Schnitger, F.M., 1964, Forgotten kingdoms in Sumatra. Leiden: Brill.
Sherman, D. George, 1990, Rice, rupees, and ritual; Economy and society among the Samosir
Batak of Sumatra. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Shore, Bradd, 1989, ‘Mana and tapu’, in: Alan Howard and Robert Borofsky (eds), Developments
in Polynesian ethnology, pp. 137-73. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Siahaan, E.K., et al, 1976/7, Monografi kebudayaan Tapanuli Utara. Medan: n.n.
Siahaan, N., 1964, Sedjarah kebudajaan Batak. Medan: Napitupulu.
Sibeth, Achim, 1991, The Batak. London: Thames and Hudson.
Sinaga, Richard, 1996, Leluhur marga-marga Batak dalam sejarah, silsilah dan legenda.
Jakarta: Dian Utama.
Singarimbun, Masri, 1975, Kinship, descent and alliance among the Karo Batak. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Situmorang, Sitor, 1987, ‘The position of the Sisingamangarajas from Bakkara in
relation to the three main marga-groups: Borbor, Lontung, and Sumba’, in: Rainer
Carle (ed.), Cultures and societies of North Sumatra, pp. 221-33. Berlin: Reimer.
-, 1993, Toba Na Sae. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
The Trans-Sumatra Trade and the Ethnicization of the ‘Batak’ 409
Smith, Anthony D., 1986, The ethnic origins of nations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, Anthony D., and John Hutchinson (eds), 1996, Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Soo, Kee-long, 1998, ‘Dissolving hegemony or changing trade pattern? Images of
Srivijaya in the Chinese sources of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries’, Journal of
Southeast Asian Studies 29-2:295-308.
Stephan, Nouha, 1998, ‘Le camphre dans les sources arabes et persanes; Production
et usages’, in: Claude Guillot (ed.), Histoire de Barus, pp. 224-41. Paris: Association
Archipel. [Cahier d’Archipel 30.]
Subbarayalu, Y., 1998, ‘The Tamil merchant-guild inscription at Barus; A rediscovery’,
in: Claude Guillot (ed.), Histoire de Barus, pp. 25-33. Paris: Association Archipel.
[Cahier d’Archipel 30.]
Tarigan, H. Guntur, 1972, ‘The structure and organization of Simalungun society’,
Sumatra Research Bulletin 2-1:42-58.
Teeuw, A., 1959, ‘The history of the Malay language’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en
Volkenkunde 115-2:138-56.
Tengku Luckman Sinar, 1986, Sari sejarah Serdang. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan
dan Kebudayaan.
Tideman, }., 1936, Hindoe-invloed in noordelijk Batakland. Amsterdam: De Valk.
Tobing, Adniel L., 1967, Si Singamangaradja I-XII. Medan: Marpaung. [Sixth edition.]
Vergouwen, J.C., 1964, Social organization and customary law of the Toba-Batak of Northern
Sumatra. The Hague: Nijhoff. [Translation of Dutch edition of 1933.]
Voorhoeve, Petrus, 1927, Overzicht van de volksverhalen der Bataks. [PhD thesis, Leiden
University.]
-, 1973, ‘Some remarks on Karo-Batak literature’, Sumatra Research Bulletin 3-1:39-42.
-, 1979/80, ‘Elio Modigliani’s Batak books’, Archivio per VAntropologia e la Etnologia
109-110:62-94.
Warneck, Johannes, 1906, Toba-Batak-Deutsches Wbrterbuch. Batavia: Landsdrukkerij.
Westenberg, C.J., 1892, ‘Aanteekeningen omtrent de godsdienstige begrippen der
Karo-Batak’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 41:218-53.
-, 1905, ‘Bataksche rijkjes Dolok en Poerba’, Tijdschrift van het Aardrijkskundig Genootschap
22:576-603.
Wilier, T., 1846, ‘Verzameling der Battahsche wetten en instellingen in Mandheling en
Pertibi; Gevolg van een overzigt van land en volk in die streken’, Tijdschrift van
Nederlandsch-Indie 8-2:145-424.
Wolters, O.W., 1969, Early Indonesian commerce. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ypes, W.K.H., 1932, Bijdrage tot de kenis van de stamverwantschap, de inheemsche rechtsgemeenschappen
en het grondrecht der Toba- en Dairibataks. Leiden: Adatrechtstichting.
-, 1944, ‘De Bataks en de tempelbouwvallen in Padang Lawas in Mandailing’, Cultureel
Indie 6:135-43.
Zeijlstra, H.H., 1913, ‘Boschproducten’, in: K.W. van Gorkom (ed.), Oost-Indische cultures,
Vol. 3, pp. 791-874. Amsterdam: De Bussy.
=================================

1 Comment

  1. BATAK COMMUNITY AND TRADES LINK WAS MUCH BETTER BEFORE CHRISTIANITY HKBP/CHATOLIC CAME AND DESTROYED BATAK ECONOMY AND BUSINESS AND CULTURE/UNITY.”POSITIVE”.by roy_sianipar « my radical judgement by roysianipar said,

    […] https://roysianipar.wordpress.com/part3-batak-trades-link/ roysianipar @ 1:23 am [filed under Uncategorized tagged aceh, ambon, arab, balige, batak, bonysianipar, charliesianipar, dairi, europe, INDONESIA, iraq, JAKARTA, JAWA, karo, medan, menado, monangsianipar, pakpak, ROYSIANIPAR, sahatsianipar, siantar, simalungun, sipirok, sumatrautara, tarutung, terrorist, unitedstate, VIKYSIANIPAR […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: